Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Cope v. Berryhill, 0:17-cv-431-BHH. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. South Carolina Number: infdco20180604b61 Visitors: 7
Filed: Jun. 01, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 01, 2018
Summary: ORDER BRUCE HOWE HENDRICKS , District Judge . This matter is before the Court upon Plaintiff's motion for attorney's fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA"), 28 U.S.C. 2412. In her motion, Plaintiff seeks attorney's fees in the amount of $4,845.75, representing 24.85 attorney hours at the hourly rate of $195.00, plus $16.00 in expenses. On May 30, 2018, Defendant filed a response to Plaintiff's motion, notifying the Court that Defendant does not object to Plaintiff's re
More

ORDER

This matter is before the Court upon Plaintiff's motion for attorney's fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA"), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. In her motion, Plaintiff seeks attorney's fees in the amount of $4,845.75, representing 24.85 attorney hours at the hourly rate of $195.00, plus $16.00 in expenses. On May 30, 2018, Defendant filed a response to Plaintiff's motion, notifying the Court that Defendant does not object to Plaintiff's request.

Attorney's fees may be awarded pursuant to EAJA where the government's position is not substantially justified. The substantial justification test is one of reasonableness in law and fact. See Pierce v. Underwood, 487 U.S. 552, 565 (1988). The district court has broad discretion to set the attorney fee amount. "[A] district court will always retain substantial discretion in fixing the amount of an EAJA award. Exorbitant, unfounded, or procedurally defective fee applications . . . are matters that the district court can recognize." Hyatt v. North Carolina Dep't of Human Res., 315 F.3d 239, 254 (4th Cir. 2002) (citing Comm'r v. Jean, 496 U.S. 154, 163 (1990)). Moreover, the court should not only consider the "position taken by the United States in the civil action," but also the "action or failure to act by the agency upon which the civil action is based." 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(2)(D), as amended by P.L. 99-80, § 2(c)(2)(B).

After consideration, it is hereby

ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion (ECF No. 23) is granted, and Plaintiff is awarded attorney's fees in the amount of $4,845.75, plus $16.00 in expenses, pursuant to EAJA, made payable to Plaintiff and delivered to the business address of Plaintiff's counsel.1

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. As the Supreme Court made clear in Astrue v. Ratliff, attorney's fees under EAJA are made payable to the prevailing litigant and not to the litigant's attorney. 560 U.S. 586, 598 (2010) (holding that the plain text of EAJA requires that attorney's fees be awarded to the litigant, thus subjecting EAJA fees to an offset of any pre-existing federal debts).
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer