BAXTER v. GLUNT, 11-1559. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20120126923
Visitors: 11
Filed: Jan. 24, 2012
Latest Update: Jan. 24, 2012
Summary: ORDER JOEL H. SLOMSKY, Judge. AND NOW, this 24th day of January 2012, upon careful and independent consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 1), Respondent's Answer to the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 7), and the Report and Recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge Timothy R. Rice (Doc. No. 8), it is ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Rice is APPROVED and ADOPTED. 1 2. The Petition for the Writ of Habea
Summary: ORDER JOEL H. SLOMSKY, Judge. AND NOW, this 24th day of January 2012, upon careful and independent consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 1), Respondent's Answer to the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 7), and the Report and Recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge Timothy R. Rice (Doc. No. 8), it is ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Rice is APPROVED and ADOPTED. 1 2. The Petition for the Writ of Habeas..
More
ORDER
JOEL H. SLOMSKY, Judge.
AND NOW, this 24th day of January 2012, upon careful and independent consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 1), Respondent's Answer to the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 7), and the Report and Recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge Timothy R. Rice (Doc. No. 8), it is ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Rice is APPROVED and ADOPTED.1
2. The Petition for the Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 1) is DENIED.
3. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.
4. The Clerk of Court shall mark this case closed for statistical purposes.
FootNotes
1. Magistrate Judge Rice filed the Report and Recommendation on July 29, 2011. On August 29, 2011, the Court granted Petitioner's request for an extension of time to file his objections to the Report and Recommendation. (Doc. No. 10.) Thereafter, the Court granted two additional requests from Petitioner for an extension of time to file his objections. (Doc. Nos. 11-14.) According to the Court's October 28, 2011 Order (Doc. No. 14), Petitioner's objections were due on December 27, 2011. As of the date of this Order, no objections have been filed.
Source: Leagle
