Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

WILLIAMS v. COLVIN, 1:13-0070-TMC. (2014)

Court: District Court, D. South Carolina Number: infdco20140813d67 Visitors: 7
Filed: Aug. 12, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 12, 2014
Summary: ORDER TIMOTHY M. CAIN, District Judge. On July 25, 2014, Plaintiff Exzerra Lashawn Williams ("Williams") filed a motion for attorney's fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA"), 28 U.S.C. 2412, on the basis that she was the prevailing party and the position taken by the Commissioner in this action was not substantially justified. (ECF No.28). The Commissioner responded on August 4, 2014, stating that the parties have agreed to an award of $3,132.01 for attorney's fees. (ECF
More

ORDER

TIMOTHY M. CAIN, District Judge.

On July 25, 2014, Plaintiff Exzerra Lashawn Williams ("Williams") filed a motion for attorney's fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA"), 28 U.S.C. § 2412, on the basis that she was the prevailing party and the position taken by the Commissioner in this action was not substantially justified. (ECF No.28). The Commissioner responded on August 4, 2014, stating that the parties have agreed to an award of $3,132.01 for attorney's fees. (ECF No. 29).

In light of the Court's prior remand of this matter, and in the absence of any contention by the Commissioner that her position was substantially justified or that special circumstances exist that would render an award of attorney's fees unjust, the Court concludes that the Plaintiff is entitled to an award of attorney's fees under the EAJA in the amount agreed upon by the parties. Accordingly, Williams' motion for attorney's fees (ECF No. 28) is GRANTED, and Williams is awarded $3,132.01 in attorney's fees.2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Carolyn W. Colvin became the Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration on February 14, 2013. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.25(d), Colvin should be substituted for Michael J. Astrue as the Defendant in this action.
2. The court notes that the fees must be paid to Plaintiff. See Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010) (holding that the plain text of the EAJA requires that attorney's fees be awarded to the litigant, thus subjecting EAJA fees to offset of any pre-existing federal debts); see also Stephens v. Astrue, 565 F.3d 131, 139 (4th Cir. 2009) (same).
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer