U.S. v. Williams, 7:18-CR-111-2-FL. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20181115c22
Visitors: 6
Filed: Nov. 13, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 13, 2018
Summary: ORDER ROBERT B. JONES, JR. , Magistrate Judge . This matter came before the Court on the defendant's unopposed motion to continue arraignment in this matter. For good cause shown, the motion is GRANTED, and the arraignment is continued to the January 15, 2019, term in New Bern. The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and defendant in a speedy trial. The period of delay necessitated by this continuance is exclude
Summary: ORDER ROBERT B. JONES, JR. , Magistrate Judge . This matter came before the Court on the defendant's unopposed motion to continue arraignment in this matter. For good cause shown, the motion is GRANTED, and the arraignment is continued to the January 15, 2019, term in New Bern. The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and defendant in a speedy trial. The period of delay necessitated by this continuance is excluded..
More
ORDER
ROBERT B. JONES, JR., Magistrate Judge.
This matter came before the Court on the defendant's unopposed motion to continue arraignment in this matter. For good cause shown, the motion is GRANTED, and the arraignment is continued to the January 15, 2019, term in New Bern.
The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and defendant in a speedy trial. The period of delay necessitated by this continuance is excluded from Speedy Trial Act computation pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (h)(7)(A).
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
