ORDER

TIMOTHY M. CAIN, District Judge.

The plaintiff brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security ("Commissioner") denying his claim for disability insurance benefits. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Civil Rule 73.02, D.S.C., this matter was referred to a magistrate judge for pretrial handling. The plaintiff asserts that the Administrative Law Judge's ("ALJ") errors below warrant remand for the payment of benefits. (ECF Nos. 15, 21). The Commissioner, however, has moved this court to remand the case pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further administrative proceedings. (ECF No. 20). Before the court is the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation ("Report"), recommending that the court grant the Commissioner's motion. (ECF No. 25). Neither party has filed objections to the Report, and the time to do so has now run.

The Report has no presumptive weight and the responsibility to make a final determination in this matter remains with this court. See Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 270-71 (1976). In the absence of objections, this court is not required to provide an explanation for adopting the Report. See Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199 (4th Cir. 1983). Rather, "in the absence of a timely filed objection, a district court need not conduct a de novo review, but instead must only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation." Diamond v. Colonial Life & Acc. Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005) (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 advisory committee's note).

After a thorough and careful review of the record, the court adopts the Report's recommended disposition.2 The Commissioner's motion to remand (ECF No. 20) is GRANTED, and the Commissioner's final decision is vacated and remanded pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.