SINGLETON v. HARRY, 1:13-cv-2711. (2016)
Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20160916e91
Visitors: 8
Filed: Sep. 13, 2016
Latest Update: Sep. 13, 2016
Summary: ORDER SYLVIA H. RAMBO , District Judge . AND NOW, this 13 th day of September, 2016, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: 1) The report and recommendation (Doc. 24) is ADOPTED; 2) The Eighth Amendment claim is dismissed with prejudice; 3) The due process claim of being held in confinement without having a parole revocation hearing is not dismissed; 4) Should Defendants file a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Middle District Local Rule 56.1, Plaintiff shall have 30 days to purs
Summary: ORDER SYLVIA H. RAMBO , District Judge . AND NOW, this 13 th day of September, 2016, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: 1) The report and recommendation (Doc. 24) is ADOPTED; 2) The Eighth Amendment claim is dismissed with prejudice; 3) The due process claim of being held in confinement without having a parole revocation hearing is not dismissed; 4) Should Defendants file a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Middle District Local Rule 56.1, Plaintiff shall have 30 days to pursu..
More
ORDER
SYLVIA H. RAMBO, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 13th day of September, 2016, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:
1) The report and recommendation (Doc. 24) is ADOPTED;
2) The Eighth Amendment claim is dismissed with prejudice;
3) The due process claim of being held in confinement without having a parole revocation hearing is not dismissed;
4) Should Defendants file a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Middle District Local Rule 56.1, Plaintiff shall have 30 days to pursue discovery in order to respond to the motion. Said response shall be filed within 15 days from the close of discovery.
5) This matter is remanded back to the magistrate judge.
Source: Leagle
