James v. Saul, 3:17-CV-0514-D. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. Texas
Number: infdco20191101e59
Filed: Oct. 28, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 28, 2019
Summary: ORDER SIDNEY A. FITZWATER , Senior District Judge . After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), the undersigned district judge is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct, and they are adopted as the findings and conclusions of the court. It is therefore ordered that the findings, conclusions,
Summary: ORDER SIDNEY A. FITZWATER , Senior District Judge . After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), the undersigned district judge is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct, and they are adopted as the findings and conclusions of the court. It is therefore ordered that the findings, conclusions, a..
More
ORDER
SIDNEY A. FITZWATER, Senior District Judge.
After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned district judge is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct, and they are adopted as the findings and conclusions of the court.
It is therefore ordered that the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge are adopted. Accordingly, plaintiff's Notice of Motion for Attorney's Fees Pursuant to Social Security Act Section 206(b)(1), filed August 30, 2019 (doc. 29), is GRANTED, and the plaintiff's counsel is hereby awarded $17,847.38 in attorney's fees out of the plaintiff's pastdue benefits under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b).
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
