Seabrooks v. Core Civic, Inc., 3:17-cv-01328. (2019)
Court: District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Number: infdco20190724e02
Visitors: 7
Filed: Jul. 23, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 23, 2019
Summary: ORDER ALETA A. TRAUGER , District Judge . The pro se plaintiff has filed a "Motion to Withdraw re Complaint" in which he states that he "it would be detrimental to the plaintiff to continue to prosecute this action." (Doc. No. 60 at 1). The court construes the plaintiff's motion as a motion to voluntarily dismiss this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). The motion is hereby GRANTED , and this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . Consequently, the motions to dis
Summary: ORDER ALETA A. TRAUGER , District Judge . The pro se plaintiff has filed a "Motion to Withdraw re Complaint" in which he states that he "it would be detrimental to the plaintiff to continue to prosecute this action." (Doc. No. 60 at 1). The court construes the plaintiff's motion as a motion to voluntarily dismiss this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). The motion is hereby GRANTED , and this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . Consequently, the motions to dism..
More
ORDER
ALETA A. TRAUGER, District Judge.
The pro se plaintiff has filed a "Motion to Withdraw re Complaint" in which he states that he "it would be detrimental to the plaintiff to continue to prosecute this action." (Doc. No. 60 at 1).
The court construes the plaintiff's motion as a motion to voluntarily dismiss this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). The motion is hereby GRANTED, and this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Consequently, the motions to dismiss (Doc. No. 57) and to stay discovery (Doc. No. 59) filed by defendant f/n/u Taylor are DENIED AS MOOT.
This is the final order denying all relief in this case. The Clerk SHALL enter judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(b).
It is so ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
