ORTLIP v. COLVIN, 13-1725. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20140418i59
Visitors: 5
Filed: Apr. 16, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 16, 2014
Summary: ORDER R. BARCLAY SURRICK, District Judge. AND NOW, this 16 th day of April, 2014, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Brief and Statement of Issues in Support of Request for Review (Docket No. 8) filed August 13, 2013; upon consideration of Defendant's Response to Request for Review of Plaintiff (Docket No. 9) filed September 16, 2013; and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Henry S. Perkin dated March 31, 2014, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The Report and
Summary: ORDER R. BARCLAY SURRICK, District Judge. AND NOW, this 16 th day of April, 2014, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Brief and Statement of Issues in Support of Request for Review (Docket No. 8) filed August 13, 2013; upon consideration of Defendant's Response to Request for Review of Plaintiff (Docket No. 9) filed September 16, 2013; and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Henry S. Perkin dated March 31, 2014, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The Report and ..
More
ORDER
R. BARCLAY SURRICK, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 16th day of April, 2014, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Brief and Statement of Issues in Support of Request for Review (Docket No. 8) filed August 13, 2013; upon consideration of Defendant's Response to Request for Review of Plaintiff (Docket No. 9) filed September 16, 2013; and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Henry S. Perkin dated March 31, 2014, IT IS ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2. The relief sought by Plaintiff is GRANTED in part as described below;
3. The case is REMANDED to the Commissioner pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and in accordance with the Report and Recommendation; and
4. In all other respects, Plaintiff's request for relief is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
