COLON v. KERESTES, 10-1398. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20120514834
Visitors: 15
Filed: May 11, 2012
Latest Update: May 11, 2012
Summary: ORDER PETRESE B. TUCKER, District Judge. AND NOW, this _____ day of May, 2012, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254, after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Faith Angell and Petitioner's objections, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED and DECREED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED. 2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S
Summary: ORDER PETRESE B. TUCKER, District Judge. AND NOW, this _____ day of May, 2012, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254, after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Faith Angell and Petitioner's objections, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED and DECREED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED. 2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S...
More
ORDER
PETRESE B. TUCKER, District Judge.
AND NOW, this _____ day of May, 2012, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Faith Angell and Petitioner's objections, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED and DECREED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.
2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, is DENIED and DISMISSED without an evidentiary hearing.
3. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.
4. The Clerk of Court shall mark the case CLOSED for statistical purposes.
Source: Leagle
