Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

The County of Jefferson v. Purdue Pharma L.P., 2:18-cv-00037-EAS-EPD. (2018)

Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio Number: infdco20180409b72 Visitors: 9
Filed: Mar. 07, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 07, 2018
Summary: ORDER ELIZABETH A. PRESTON DEAVERS , Chief Magistrate Judge . For good cause shown, the unopposed motionof PurduePharmaL.P., Purdue Pharma Inc., The Purdue Frederick Company Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Cephalon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc., Endo Phannaceuticals Inc., Allergan pic, Allergan Finance, LLC f/k/a Actavis, Inc., Watson Laboratories, Inc., Actavis LLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc
More

ORDER

For good cause shown, the unopposed motionof PurduePharmaL.P., Purdue Pharma Inc., The Purdue Frederick Company Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Cephalon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc., Endo Phannaceuticals Inc., Allergan pic, Allergan Finance, LLC f/k/a Actavis, Inc., Watson Laboratories, Inc., Actavis LLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc., Endo Health Solutions Inc., and Insys Therapeutics, Inc. (collectively, "Manufacturer Defendants") to stay the date by which to respond to the Complaint (ECF No, 13) is GRANTED. The Manufacturer Defendants shall have sixty (60) days after the final determination of removal to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer