ARNOLD v. PHILLIPS, 10-5090. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20120720b86
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jul. 19, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 19, 2012
Summary: ORDER JOHN R. PADOVA, District Judge. AND NOW, this 18th day of July, 2012, upon consideration of the Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) filed by Defendant Dr. Ronald Phillips and Dr. Carl Pierce (Docket No. 57), and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Motion is GRANTED. 2. The claims against Defendants Pierce and Phillips are DISMISSED, and Defendants Phillips and Pierce are DISMISSED as Defen
Summary: ORDER JOHN R. PADOVA, District Judge. AND NOW, this 18th day of July, 2012, upon consideration of the Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) filed by Defendant Dr. Ronald Phillips and Dr. Carl Pierce (Docket No. 57), and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Motion is GRANTED. 2. The claims against Defendants Pierce and Phillips are DISMISSED, and Defendants Phillips and Pierce are DISMISSED as Defend..
More
ORDER
JOHN R. PADOVA, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 18th day of July, 2012, upon consideration of the Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) filed by Defendant Dr. Ronald Phillips and Dr. Carl Pierce (Docket No. 57), and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The Motion is GRANTED.
2. The claims against Defendants Pierce and Phillips are DISMISSED, and Defendants Phillips and Pierce are DISMISSED as Defendants in this action.
Source: Leagle
