Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

George L. Schultz and Margaret F. Schultz v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 17764_1 (1970)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 17764_1 Visitors: 27
Filed: Jan. 09, 1970
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 420 F.2d 490 George L. SCHULTZ and Margaret F. Schultz, Appellants v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. No. 17764. United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit. Argued October 23, 1969. Decided January 9, 1970. John P. Lipscomb, Lee, Toomey & Kent, Washington, D. C. (Thomas E. Jenks, Washington, D. C., Myles A. Cane, New York City, on the brief), for appellants. William L. Goldman, U. S. Dept. of Justice, Tax Division, Washington, D. C. (Johnnie M. Walters, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Meye
More

420 F.2d 490

George L. SCHULTZ and Margaret F. Schultz, Appellants
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.

No. 17764.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued October 23, 1969.

Decided January 9, 1970.

John P. Lipscomb, Lee, Toomey & Kent, Washington, D. C. (Thomas E. Jenks, Washington, D. C., Myles A. Cane, New York City, on the brief), for appellants.

William L. Goldman, U. S. Dept. of Justice, Tax Division, Washington, D. C. (Johnnie M. Walters, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Meyer Rothwacks, Lester B. Snyder, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., on the brief), for appellee.

Before KALODNER, STALEY and FREEDMAN, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

1

On this appeal the appellant taxpayers challenge the Tax Court's Decision that their four year pre-payment of storage charges, insurance premiums and state ad valorem taxes, in conjunction with their non-business purchase of substantial quantities of bulk whiskey, were not deductible as ordinary and necessary expenses under Section 212(2) of the 1954 Internal Revenue Code, but instead should be added to the cost of the whiskey.

2

The distinction between an ordinary expense and a capital expenditure in this field is based on a factual analysis of the relationship of the expenses to the entire transaction. Although storage charges, insurance premiums, and property taxes are normally deductible as ordinary expenses, they are not deductible where they are incurred as an integal part of a capital transaction. The Tax Court's determination that the pre-payments here made were incurred as part of a capital transaction is essentially a factual determination.

3

On review of the record we cannot say that the factual determination made by the Tax Court is "clearly erroneous", and accordingly its Decision will be affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer