CARTER v. CPC LOGISTICS, INC., 3:12-3637-MBS-SVH. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. South Carolina
Number: infdco20140710d49
Visitors: 19
Filed: Jul. 08, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 08, 2014
Summary: ORDER SHIVA V. HODGES, Magistrate Judge. This matter comes before the court on the motion of CPC Logistics, Inc., and CPC Medical Products, LLC ("Defendants") to compel Roderick A. Carter ("Plaintiff") to produce responses to Defendants' First Set of Interrogatories and First Set of Requests for Production served on May 22, 2014. [Entry #53]. The motion indicates that the discovery requests were duly served and that full and complete responses have not been made within the time prescribed by F
Summary: ORDER SHIVA V. HODGES, Magistrate Judge. This matter comes before the court on the motion of CPC Logistics, Inc., and CPC Medical Products, LLC ("Defendants") to compel Roderick A. Carter ("Plaintiff") to produce responses to Defendants' First Set of Interrogatories and First Set of Requests for Production served on May 22, 2014. [Entry #53]. The motion indicates that the discovery requests were duly served and that full and complete responses have not been made within the time prescribed by Fe..
More
ORDER
SHIVA V. HODGES, Magistrate Judge.
This matter comes before the court on the motion of CPC Logistics, Inc., and CPC Medical Products, LLC ("Defendants") to compel Roderick A. Carter ("Plaintiff") to produce responses to Defendants' First Set of Interrogatories and First Set of Requests for Production served on May 22, 2014. [Entry #53]. The motion indicates that the discovery requests were duly served and that full and complete responses have not been made within the time prescribed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26. Plaintiff's deadline to respond to the discovery requests was June 26, 2014. Defense counsel represents that as of July 8, 2014, Plaintiff had not answered or responded to the discovery requests. [Entry #53 at 2].
In light of the foregoing, the court grants Defendants' motion to compel. Plaintiff is directed to provide responses to the discovery request by July 22, 2014. Because Plaintiff failed to timely respond to the discovery, any and all objections are deemed waived under Fed. R. Civ. P. 33(b)(4).
The court denies the motion for attorney's fees at this time. However, if Plaintiff fails to provide the responses as directed herein, the court will grant a request for fees and costs by Defendants through a refiled motion accompanied by an affidavit setting out the time expended in connection with the motion to compel and the hourly rate that the client has been billed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
