WOODS v. U.S., 4:11cr106(8). (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. Texas
Number: infdco20160106d87
Visitors: 18
Filed: Jan. 05, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 05, 2016
Summary: ORDER RODNEY GILSTRAP , District Judge . The above-entitled and numbered civil action was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge. The Initial Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which contains proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such action, has been presented for consideration. No objections were timely filed. The court concludes that the findings and conclusions of the United States Magistrate Judge are correct, and adopts the same as
Summary: ORDER RODNEY GILSTRAP , District Judge . The above-entitled and numbered civil action was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge. The Initial Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which contains proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such action, has been presented for consideration. No objections were timely filed. The court concludes that the findings and conclusions of the United States Magistrate Judge are correct, and adopts the same as ..
More
ORDER
RODNEY GILSTRAP, District Judge.
The above-entitled and numbered civil action was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge. The Initial Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which contains proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such action, has been presented for consideration. No objections were timely filed. The court concludes that the findings and conclusions of the United States Magistrate Judge are correct, and adopts the same as the findings and conclusions of the court. It is therefore
ORDERED that the motion for default judgment (docket entry #7) is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
