Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Henry Lee Isabell, Frank Speakes, Stephen Luther Evans, Stephen Luther Evans, 18907 (1970)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 18907 Visitors: 23
Filed: Oct. 29, 1970
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 432 F.2d 785 UNITED STATES of America v. Henry Lee ISABELL, Frank Speakes, Stephen Luther Evans, Stephen Luther Evans, Appellant. No. 16968. No. 18907. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Submitted on Briefs October 9, 1970. Decided October 29, 1970. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pa.; C. William Kraft, Jr., Judge. Arthur E. Newbold, IV, Dechert, Price & Rhoads, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant. Richard Galli, Asst. U. S. Atty., Philadelphia,
More

432 F.2d 785

UNITED STATES of America
v.
Henry Lee ISABELL, Frank Speakes, Stephen Luther Evans, Stephen Luther Evans, Appellant.

No. 16968.

No. 18907.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted on Briefs October 9, 1970.

Decided October 29, 1970.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pa.; C. William Kraft, Jr., Judge.

Arthur E. Newbold, IV, Dechert, Price & Rhoads, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.

Richard Galli, Asst. U. S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa. (Louis C. Bechtle, U. S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.

Before KALODNER, STALEY and GIBBONS, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant filed a motion in the district court pursuant to Rule 35 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure which was denied. The denial was appealed in No. 16,968. The district court then ordered that appellant's sentence be amended. Thereafter, appellant's motion to remand the record to the district court was granted, and he was permitted to file an amended Rule 35 motion attacking the new sentence. This motion was denied by the district court. Appellant has appealed that denial in No. 18,907.

2

We have carefully considered the arguments made by appellant in each appeal and find them to be without merit.

3

The orders of the district court will be affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer