Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Olevera v. Henson, 2:17-CV-00114. (2018)

Court: District Court, S.D. Texas Number: infdco20180305d15 Visitors: 10
Filed: Mar. 02, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2018
Summary: ORDER HILDA TAGLE , Senior District Judge . The Court is in receipt of Respondent's July 21, 2017, motion to dismiss, Dkt. No. 15; the October 19, 2017, Memorandum and Recommendation ("M&R") of the Magistrate Judge to whom this case was referred, Dkt. No. 17; and Petitioner's October 30, 2017, objection to the M&R, Dkt. No. 18. The Court reviews objected-to portions of a Magistrate Judge's proposed findings and recommendations de novo. 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). Plaintiff's objection is frivo
More

ORDER

The Court is in receipt of Respondent's July 21, 2017, motion to dismiss, Dkt. No. 15; the October 19, 2017, Memorandum and Recommendation ("M&R") of the Magistrate Judge to whom this case was referred, Dkt. No. 17; and Petitioner's October 30, 2017, objection to the M&R, Dkt. No. 18.

The Court reviews objected-to portions of a Magistrate Judge's proposed findings and recommendations de novo. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff's objection is frivolous, conclusory, general, or contains no arguments that the M&R has not already considered. See Dkt. Nos. 17, 18; Battle v. United States Parole Comm'n, 834 F.2d 419 (5th Cir. 1987) (determining that a district court need not consider frivolous, conclusive, or general objections). After independently reviewing the record and considering the applicable law, the Court adopts the proposed M&R in its entirety. Dkt. No. 17. Thus, the Court OVERRULES Plaintiff's objection. Dkt. No. 18.

The Court hereby:

GRANTS Respondent's motion to dismiss, Dkt. No. 15, and DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE this action.

The Court will enter final judgment separately.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer