Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

PAMES v. PIERCE, C-1-12-285. (2014)

Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio Number: infdco20140925e29 Visitors: 14
Filed: Sep. 24, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 24, 2014
Summary: ORDER HERMAN J. WEBER, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 44) to which neither party has objected. Upon a de novo review of the record, the Court finds that the Judge has accurately set forth the applicable law and has properly applied it to the particular facts of this case. Accordingly, in the absence of any objection by plaintiff, this Court accepts the Report as uncontroverted. The R
More

ORDER

HERMAN J. WEBER, Senior District Judge.

This matter is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 44) to which neither party has objected.

Upon a de novo review of the record, the Court finds that the Judge has accurately set forth the applicable law and has properly applied it to the particular facts of this case. Accordingly, in the absence of any objection by plaintiff, this Court accepts the Report as uncontroverted.

The Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 44) is hereby ADOPTED AND INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE. Defendant Pierce's Motion for Summary Judgment on plaintiff's claim for excessive force under the Eighth Amendment is DENIED.

This case is RECOMMITTED to the United States Magistrate Judge for further proceedings according to law.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer