Avery v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration, 4:14-cv-681. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. Texas
Number: infdco20160223d23
Visitors: 6
Filed: Feb. 22, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2016
Summary: **NOT FOR PRINTED PUBLICATION** ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE RON CLARK , District Judge . Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636. On January 26, 2016, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that the decision of the A
Summary: **NOT FOR PRINTED PUBLICATION** ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE RON CLARK , District Judge . Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636. On January 26, 2016, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that the decision of the Ad..
More
**NOT FOR PRINTED PUBLICATION**
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
RON CLARK, District Judge.
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On January 26, 2016, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that the decision of the Administrative Law Judge be REMANDED.
Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, this court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the same as the findings and conclusions of the court.
It is, therefore, ORDERED that the decision of the Administrative Law Judge is REMANDED for further review.
Source: Leagle
