Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

PAMPLIN v. COULTER, 10-227 (2012)

Court: District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20120605b27 Visitors: 9
Filed: Jun. 04, 2012
Latest Update: Jun. 04, 2012
Summary: ORDER LISA PUPO LENIHAN, Chief Magistrate Judge. IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 32) filed by Defendants Coulter and Brody is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Motion is granted with regards to Plaintiff's excessive force claim against both Defendants involving the manner in which he was escorted back to the DHU. The Motion is also granted as to Plaintiff's claims against both Defendants in their official capacity. The Motion is denied in all other respe
More

ORDER

LISA PUPO LENIHAN, Chief Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 32) filed by Defendants Coulter and Brody is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Motion is granted with regards to Plaintiff's excessive force claim against both Defendants involving the manner in which he was escorted back to the DHU. The Motion is also granted as to Plaintiff's claims against both Defendants in their official capacity. The Motion is denied in all other respects. As consistent with the Court's Memorandum Opinion dated June 1, 2012, Plaintiff's claims currently preserved for trial are as follows: (1) excessive force claim against Defendant Coulter; (2) failure to intervene against Defendant Brody; (3) assault and battery under Pennsylvania state law against Defendants Coulter and Brody, and (4) intentional infliction of emotional distress under Pennsylvania state law against Defendants Coulter and Brody.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer