FISHER v. HIRSCH, H-12-1114. (2013)
Court: District Court, S.D. Texas
Number: infdco20130730i49
Visitors: 11
Filed: Jul. 29, 2013
Latest Update: Jul. 29, 2013
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION LEE H. ROSENTHAL, District Judge. This court has reviewed the Memorandum and Recommendation on Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment of the United States Magistrate Judge signed on July 5, 2013, and made a de novo determination. Rule 72(b), Fed. R. Civ. P.; 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C); United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219 (5th Cir. 1989). Based on the pleadings, the record, and the applicable law, the court adopts the Memorandum and Recommendation
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION LEE H. ROSENTHAL, District Judge. This court has reviewed the Memorandum and Recommendation on Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment of the United States Magistrate Judge signed on July 5, 2013, and made a de novo determination. Rule 72(b), Fed. R. Civ. P.; 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C); United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219 (5th Cir. 1989). Based on the pleadings, the record, and the applicable law, the court adopts the Memorandum and Recommendation ..
More
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION
LEE H. ROSENTHAL, District Judge.
This court has reviewed the Memorandum and Recommendation on Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment of the United States Magistrate Judge signed on July 5, 2013, and made a de novo determination. Rule 72(b), Fed. R. Civ. P.; 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219 (5th Cir. 1989). Based on the pleadings, the record, and the applicable law, the court adopts the Memorandum and Recommendation as this court's Memorandum and Order. This court denies the summary judgment motion filed by the plaintiff, Duane Fisher (Docket Entry No. 51), and grants the summary judgment motion filed by the defendants (Docket Entry No. 50), for the reasons set out in detail in the Memorandum and Recommendation. Final judgment is entered by separate order.
Source: Leagle