Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Greene v. Saul, 2:18-cv-00061. (2019)

Court: District Court, M.D. Tennessee Number: infdco20190910b54 Visitors: 5
Filed: Sep. 09, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 09, 2019
Summary: ORDER WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR. , Chief District Judge . Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 20) recommending that the Greene's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Doc. No. 15), to which the Commissioner responded (Doc. No. 19) in opposition, be denied and the Commissioner's decision be affirmed. No objections have been filed to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Upon de novo review in accordance with Rule 72 of the
More

ORDER

Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 20) recommending that the Greene's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Doc. No. 15), to which the Commissioner responded (Doc. No. 19) in opposition, be denied and the Commissioner's decision be affirmed. No objections have been filed to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.

Upon de novo review in accordance with Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court agrees with the recommended disposition. Accordingly, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is APPROVED AND ADOPTED, and Greene's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Doc. No. 15) is DENIED. The Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer