Greene v. Saul, 2:18-cv-00061. (2019)
Court: District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Number: infdco20190910b54
Visitors: 5
Filed: Sep. 09, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 09, 2019
Summary: ORDER WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR. , Chief District Judge . Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 20) recommending that the Greene's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Doc. No. 15), to which the Commissioner responded (Doc. No. 19) in opposition, be denied and the Commissioner's decision be affirmed. No objections have been filed to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Upon de novo review in accordance with Rule 72 of the
Summary: ORDER WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR. , Chief District Judge . Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 20) recommending that the Greene's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Doc. No. 15), to which the Commissioner responded (Doc. No. 19) in opposition, be denied and the Commissioner's decision be affirmed. No objections have been filed to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Upon de novo review in accordance with Rule 72 of the F..
More
ORDER
WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR., Chief District Judge.
Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 20) recommending that the Greene's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Doc. No. 15), to which the Commissioner responded (Doc. No. 19) in opposition, be denied and the Commissioner's decision be affirmed. No objections have been filed to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.
Upon de novo review in accordance with Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court agrees with the recommended disposition. Accordingly, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is APPROVED AND ADOPTED, and Greene's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Doc. No. 15) is DENIED. The Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle