Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

IN RE BAILEYS, 01-16-00830-CV. (2016)

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas Number: intxco20161025872 Visitors: 1
Filed: Oct. 25, 2016
Latest Update: Oct. 25, 2016
Summary: ORDER LAURA CARTER HIGLEY , Judge . On October 20, 2016, the relator, Steven Baileys, filed a petition for a writ of mandamus and prohibition seeking to vacate the respondent trial judge's September 12, 2016 order denying relator's motion to declare previous orders void and seeks to prohibit further proceedings. With the petition, relator filed a notice of related case, 01-16-00671-CV, an interlocutory appeal from the order, signed on July 12, 2016, denying relator's motion for reconsiderat
More

ORDER

On October 20, 2016, the relator, Steven Baileys, filed a petition for a writ of mandamus and prohibition seeking to vacate the respondent trial judge's September 12, 2016 order denying relator's motion to declare previous orders void and seeks to prohibit further proceedings. With the petition, relator filed a notice of related case, 01-16-00671-CV, an interlocutory appeal from the order, signed on July 12, 2016, denying relator's motion for reconsideration of the denial of his special appearance, and an appendix.

Although relator's petition included an appendix with a record for a hearing held on January 11, 2016, his petition referred to two other hearings held on June 29, 2016, and September 12, 2016, but it did not contain those records or the required certification. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.7(a)(2). The reporter's record for the June 29, 2016 hearing was filed on September 9, 2016, in appellate cause number 01-16-00671-CV.

Thus, we ORDER relator, within 10 days of the date of this order, to file a supplemental record containing the hearing record for June 29, 2016, and either a request for preparing and paying for the reporter's record for the September 9, 2016 hearing or a certification that no relevant testimony, or judicial reasoning, was adduced in connection with the matter complained at that hearing. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.7(a)(2), (b).

Finally, the Court requests a response to the petition for writ of mandamus by any real party in interest. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(b)(1). The response, if any, shall be filed within 30 days from the date of this order. See id. 2, 52.4.

It is so ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer