Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. PECO Energy Company, 19-2884. (2020)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20200128f68 Visitors: 8
Filed: Jan. 27, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 27, 2020
Summary: ORDER GENE E.K. PRATTER , District Judge . AND NOW, this 24th day of January, 2020, upon consideration of the Motion of the Defendant, PECO Energy Company, for Dismissal of the Complaint (Doc. No. 8), the Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 9), the Reply in Support (Doc. No. 10) 1 , and the Surreply in Opposition (Doc. No. 12), it is ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 8) is GRANTED. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint on or before 21 days from the date of this order. FootN
More

ORDER

AND NOW, this 24th day of January, 2020, upon consideration of the Motion of the Defendant, PECO Energy Company, for Dismissal of the Complaint (Doc. No. 8), the Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 9), the Reply in Support (Doc. No. 10)1, and the Surreply in Opposition (Doc. No. 12), it is ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 8) is GRANTED. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint on or before 21 days from the date of this order.

FootNotes


1. State Farm's counsel requests that the Court disregard PECO's Reply because it allegedly failed to meet the Court's General Pretrial and Trial Procedures. (Doc. No. 11). Finding that PECO submitted its Reply in accordance with Section III.C of the Court's General Pretrial and Trial Procedures, Civil Cases, the Court rejects State Farm's request.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer