Opinions of the United 1994 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 12-7-1994 United States v. One 1973 Rolls Royce Precedential or Non-Precedential: Docket 93-1417 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1994 Recommended Citation "United States v. One 1973 Rolls Royce" (1994). 1994 Decisions. Paper 211. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1994/211 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1994 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ____________ NO. 93-1417 ____________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee v. ONE 1973 ROLLS ROYCE, V.I.N. SRH-16266, (by and through Claimant Oscar B. Goodman), Appellant ________________________________ NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYERS, Amicus-curiae ________________________________________________________ On Appeal From the United States District Court For the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Civ. No. 90-01487) ________________________________________________________ Argued: December 6, 1993 Before: BECKER, NYGAARD, and WEIS, Circuit Judges. Opinion Filed: November 25, 1994 MICHAEL R. STILES United States Attorney WALTER S. BATTY, JR. Assistant U.S. Attorney Chief of Appeals JOEL M. FRIEDMAN Assistant U.S. Attorney FRANK A. LABOR, III (ARGUED) Assistant U.S. Attorney 615 Chestnut Street  Philadelphia, PA 19106 Attorneys for Appellee United States of America DAVID CHESNOFF, ESQUIRE (ARGUED) Goodman & Chesnoff 520 South Fourth Street Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 STEPHEN STEIN, ESQUIRE 520 South Fourth Street Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 ROBERT E. MURDOCK, ESQUIRE Murdock & Palazzo 520 South Fourth Street Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Attorneys for Appellant One 1973 Rolls Royce VIN SRH-16266 PETER GOLDBERGER, ESQ. (ARGUED) 50 Rittenhouse Place Ardmore, PA 19003-2276 Attorney for Amicus-curiae National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers __________________________ ORDER AMENDING OPINION __________________________ The opinion in the above-captioned case filed November 25, 1994, is amended as follows: 1. On page 4, the beginning second sentence should read as follows: Nicodemo Scarfo, Sr., a co-defendant of Goodman's former clients (and at one time . . .)  2. On page 9, first paragraph after Section IIA, the date should be January 1986. 3. On page 11, first full paragraph, delete the word "unexpected" on the first line. In the second paragraph, on the first line replace "Eventually" with "Meanwhile," and add the word "had" before convinced. In the last sentence, replace the phrase "counter-surveillance equipment" with "surveillance devices." 4. On page 29 within footnote 17, last paragraph, in penultimate sentence, add the word "absolute" before "Sixth Amendment." 5. On page 36, in the paragraph after the indentation, in the first sentence, replace "any one" with "either." BY THE COURT: /s/ Edward R. Becker Circuit Judge DATED: December 7, l994