Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Mayes, 3:14-CR-147-TAV-DCP. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. Tennessee Number: infdco20180727f33 Visitors: 8
Filed: Jul. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 26, 2018
Summary: ORDER THOMAS A. VARLAN , Chief District Judge . This criminal case is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation entered by United States Magistrate Judge Debra C. Poplin on July 5, 2018 (the "R&R") [Doc. 366]. In the R&R, Judge Poplin recommends that the defendant's pro se motion for return of property [Doc. 349] be denied. There have been no timely objections to the R&R, and enough time has passed since the filing of the R&R to treat any objections as having been waived. See 2
More

ORDER

This criminal case is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation entered by United States Magistrate Judge Debra C. Poplin on July 5, 2018 (the "R&R") [Doc. 366]. In the R&R, Judge Poplin recommends that the defendant's pro se motion for return of property [Doc. 349] be denied. There have been no timely objections to the R&R, and enough time has passed since the filing of the R&R to treat any objections as having been waived. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Fed. R. Crim. P. 51.

After a careful review of the R&R, the Court is in agreement with Judge Poplin's analysis and recommendation, which the Court adopts and incorporates into its ruling. Therefore, the Court ACCEPTS IN WHOLE the R&R [Doc. 366], and the defendant's pro se motion for return of property [Doc. 349] is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer