ARGENTINA v. GILLETTE, 17-2908. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20180131f95
Visitors: 7
Filed: Jan. 30, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 30, 2018
Summary: ORDER WENDY BEETLESTONE , District Judge . AND NOW, this 30th day of January, 2018, upon consideration of the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 13) and Plaintiff's Response to the Motion (ECF No. 16), IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART with respect to all of Plaintiff's claims in his Complaint (ECF No. 1) except Count II (42 U.S.C. 1982). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED with respect to Count II of the Compl
Summary: ORDER WENDY BEETLESTONE , District Judge . AND NOW, this 30th day of January, 2018, upon consideration of the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 13) and Plaintiff's Response to the Motion (ECF No. 16), IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART with respect to all of Plaintiff's claims in his Complaint (ECF No. 1) except Count II (42 U.S.C. 1982). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED with respect to Count II of the Compla..
More
ORDER
WENDY BEETLESTONE, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 30th day of January, 2018, upon consideration of the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 13) and Plaintiff's Response to the Motion (ECF No. 16), IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART with respect to all of Plaintiff's claims in his Complaint (ECF No. 1) except Count II (42 U.S.C. § 1982). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED with respect to Count II of the Complaint.
Source: Leagle
