Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Chemetron Corp. v. Jones, 94-3371 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 94-3371 Visitors: 9
Filed: Dec. 18, 1995
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Opinions of the United 1995 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 12-18-1995 Chemetron Corp. v. Jones Precedential or Non-Precedential: Docket 94-3371 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1995 Recommended Citation "Chemetron Corp. v. Jones" (1995). 1995 Decisions. Paper 311. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1995/311 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United Stat
More
Opinions of the United 1995 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 12-18-1995 Chemetron Corp. v. Jones Precedential or Non-Precedential: Docket 94-3371 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1995 Recommended Citation "Chemetron Corp. v. Jones" (1995). 1995 Decisions. Paper 311. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1995/311 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1995 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 94-3371 CHEMETRON CORPORATION v. PHYLLIS JASKEY JONES; PAMELA JO SWANSINGER; SANDRA JASKEY HUJARSKI; PATRICIA HUJARSKI; TERESA HUJARSKI ROSS; JANICE JASKEY BUTVIN; FRANK BUTVIN; ROBERT BUTVIN; BRIAN BUTVIN; SUSAN BUTVIN; WALTER ANIELSKI; ARLENE VANS; YVONNE VANS BEKOSCKE; ANTHONY VANS; GREGORY VANS; CAROL SCHULTZ; MARY SHAFFER; BRITTANY CULL; STEPHANIE SCHAFFER, Appellants. On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Civil Action No. 93-cv-01582) BEFORE: SCIRICA, ROTH and SAROKIN, Circuit Judges Argued on February 3, 1995 O R D E R IT IS ORDERED that the slip opinion in the above case, filed on December 18, 1995, be amended as follows: On page 15, line 16, delete the word "known" and replace it with the word "unknown". The full sentence should now read: For these reasons, we will affirm the district court's rulings that claimants were unknown creditors and that Chemetron's publication notice was sufficient. /s/ Jane R. Roth Circuit Judge Dated: December 21, 1995
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer