Reactor Services International, Inc. v. United Refining Company, 3:18-CV-00210. (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. Texas
Number: infdco20190610585
Visitors: 7
Filed: May 29, 2019
Latest Update: May 29, 2019
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION GEORGE C. HANKS, JR. , District Judge . On May 6, 2019, this case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Andrew M. Edison pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B). See Dkt. 34. Pending before Judge Edison was Defendant United Refining Company's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedures 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(6). Dkt. 18. On May 14, 2019, Judge Edison filed a Memorandum and Recommendation (Dkt. 36) recomm
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION GEORGE C. HANKS, JR. , District Judge . On May 6, 2019, this case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Andrew M. Edison pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B). See Dkt. 34. Pending before Judge Edison was Defendant United Refining Company's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedures 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(6). Dkt. 18. On May 14, 2019, Judge Edison filed a Memorandum and Recommendation (Dkt. 36) recomme..
More
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION
GEORGE C. HANKS, JR., District Judge.
On May 6, 2019, this case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Andrew M. Edison pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). See Dkt. 34. Pending before Judge Edison was Defendant United Refining Company's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedures 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(6). Dkt. 18. On May 14, 2019, Judge Edison filed a Memorandum and Recommendation (Dkt. 36) recommending that Defendant United Refining Company's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedures 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(6) be GRANTED.
No objections have been filed to the Memorandum and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Court reviews the Memorandum and Recommendation for plain error on the face of the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also, FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3).
Based on the pleadings, the record, and the applicable law, the Court finds that there is no plain error apparent from the face of the record. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:
(1) Judge Edison's Memorandum and Recommendation (Dkt. 36) is APPROVED AND ADOPTED in its entirety as the holding of the Court; and
(2) Defendant United Refining Company's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedures 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(6) (Dkt. 18) is GRANTED.
It is so ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
