Filed: Jun. 30, 1995
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Opinions of the United 1995 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 6-30-1995 United States v Edmonds Precedential or Non-Precedential: Docket 93-1890 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1995 Recommended Citation "United States v Edmonds" (1995). 1995 Decisions. Paper 104. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1995/104 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States
Summary: Opinions of the United 1995 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 6-30-1995 United States v Edmonds Precedential or Non-Precedential: Docket 93-1890 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1995 Recommended Citation "United States v Edmonds" (1995). 1995 Decisions. Paper 104. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1995/104 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States C..
More
Opinions of the United 1995 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 6-30-1995 United States v Edmonds Precedential or Non-Precedential: Docket 93-1890 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1995 Recommended Citation "United States v Edmonds" (1995). 1995 Decisions. Paper 104. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1995/104 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1995 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _______________ NO. 93-1890 _______________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. THEODORE EDMONDS, Appellant _______________ Present: SLOVITER, Chief Judge, BECKER, STAPLETON, MANSMANN, GREENBERG, HUTCHINSON, SCIRICA, COWEN, NYGAARD, ALITO, ROTH, LEWIS, McKEE, SAROKIN, and GARTH298, Circuit Judges. O R D E R A majority of the active judges having voted for rehearing in banc in the above appeal, it is O R D E R E D that the Clerk of this Court vacate the panel's opinion and judgment entered April 18, 1995 insofar as it relates to No. 93-1890 and list the above case for rehearing in banc at the convenience of the court. By the Court, \s\ Dolores K. Sloviter Chief Judge Dated: June 29, l995 298 as to panel rehearing only.