BALL v. LAMAS, 09-1918. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20120510c16
Visitors: 12
Filed: May 09, 2012
Latest Update: May 09, 2012
Summary: ORDER BERLE M. SCHILLER, Judge. AND NOW, this 9 day of may, 2012, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Timothy R. Rice and objections there to IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus DENIED with prejudice; 3. The motions for appointment of counsel are DENIED; 4. The requests
Summary: ORDER BERLE M. SCHILLER, Judge. AND NOW, this 9 day of may, 2012, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Timothy R. Rice and objections there to IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus DENIED with prejudice; 3. The motions for appointment of counsel are DENIED; 4. The requests f..
More
ORDER
BERLE M. SCHILLER, Judge.
AND NOW, this 9 day of may, 2012, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Timothy R. Rice and objections there to IT IS ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus DENIED with prejudice;
3. The motions for appointment of counsel are DENIED;
4. The requests for an evidentiary hearing and discovery are DENIED;
5. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability; and
6. The Clerk of the Court shall mark this case closed for statistical purposes.
Source: Leagle
