Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Kirk v. Raymark, 94-1745 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 94-1745 Visitors: 11
Filed: May 24, 1995
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Opinions of the United 1995 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 5-24-1995 Kirk v Raymark Precedential or Non-Precedential: Docket 94-1745 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1995 Recommended Citation "Kirk v Raymark" (1995). 1995 Decisions. Paper 96. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1995/96 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for
More
Opinions of the United 1995 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 5-24-1995 Kirk v Raymark Precedential or Non-Precedential: Docket 94-1745 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1995 Recommended Citation "Kirk v Raymark" (1995). 1995 Decisions. Paper 96. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1995/96 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1995 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT Nos. 94-1745 and 94-1746 SARAH A. KIRK, Administratrix of the Estates of KIRK, Alfred T., Deceased and KIRK, Sarah A. in her own right v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.; EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC.; KEENE CORPORATION; GARLOCK INC; OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION; CELOTEX CORP.; GAF CORPORATION; OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS COMPANY Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation, Appellant BEFORE: STAPLETON, GREENBERG and COWEN, Circuit Judges SUR PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING The petition for rehearing filed by appellee in the above-entitled case having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this court and all judges who concurred in the decision having asked for rehearing, the petition for panel rehearing is granted. The panel opinion is hereby vacated. By the Court, /s/ Robert E. Cowen Circuit Judge Dated: May 24, l995
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer