Hill v. LA Fitness, 17-CV-2092. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20180413e49
Visitors: 12
Filed: Apr. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 12, 2018
Summary: ORDER J. CURTIS JOYNER , District Judge . AND NOW, this 10th day of April, 2018, upon consideration of the Motion of Defendant Fitness International, LLC, d/b/a LA Fitness for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 12) and Plaintiff's Response in Opposition thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED and Judgment is entered in favor of Moving Defendant and against Plaintiff as a matter of law for the reasons set forth in the preceding Memorandum Opinion.
ORDER
J. CURTIS JOYNER, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 10th day of April, 2018, upon consideration of the Motion of Defendant Fitness International, LLC, d/b/a LA Fitness for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 12) and Plaintiff's Response in Opposition thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED and Judgment is entered in favor of Moving Defendant and against Plaintiff as a matter of law for the reasons set forth in the preceding Memorandum Opinion.
Source: Leagle
