U.S. v. ORTIZ-SALAZAR, 4:13-CR-67. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Texas
Number: infdco20150511990
Visitors: 9
Filed: May 08, 2015
Latest Update: May 08, 2015
Summary: MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARCIA A. CRONE , District Judge . Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636. On May 4, 2015, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendant Gustavo Ortiz-Salazar's Motion to Excl
Summary: MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARCIA A. CRONE , District Judge . Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636. On May 4, 2015, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendant Gustavo Ortiz-Salazar's Motion to Exclu..
More
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
MARCIA A. CRONE, District Judge.
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On May 4, 2015, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendant Gustavo Ortiz-Salazar's Motion to Exclude, or in the Alternative, to Suppress Defendant's Statements (#200) be DENIED as to both Defendant Gustavo Ortiz-Salazar and Defendant Salvador Ocampo-Vergara.
No objections having been timely filed by the agreed deadline, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct. Therefore, the Court hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of this Court. It is accordingly
ORDERED that Defendant Gustavo Ortiz-Salazar's Motion to Exclude, or in the Alternative, to Suppress Defendant's Statements (#200) is DENIED as to both Defendant Gustavo Ortiz-Salazar and Defendant Salvador Ocampo-Vergara.
Source: Leagle
