Filed: Jul. 31, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Opinions of the United 1996 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 7-31-1996 Azzaro v. Allegheny Precedential or Non-Precedential: Docket 95-3253 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1996 Recommended Citation "Azzaro v. Allegheny" (1996). 1996 Decisions. Paper 147. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1996/147 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of
Summary: Opinions of the United 1996 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 7-31-1996 Azzaro v. Allegheny Precedential or Non-Precedential: Docket 95-3253 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1996 Recommended Citation "Azzaro v. Allegheny" (1996). 1996 Decisions. Paper 147. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1996/147 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of ..
More
Opinions of the United 1996 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 7-31-1996 Azzaro v. Allegheny Precedential or Non-Precedential: Docket 95-3253 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1996 Recommended Citation "Azzaro v. Allegheny" (1996). 1996 Decisions. Paper 147. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1996/147 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1996 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 95-3253 _____________ BEVERLY AZZARO, Appellant v. COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY; TOM FOERSTER, an individual and Chairman, Allegheny County Commissioners, and WAYNE FUSARO _____________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Civil No. 93-1589) _____________ Present: SLOVITER, Chief Judge, BECKER, STAPLETON, MANSMANN, GREENBERG, SCIRICA, COWEN, NYGAARD, ALITO, ROTH, LEWIS, McKEE, SAROKIN, and ROSENN, CircuitJudges. O R D E R A majority of the active judges having voted for rehearing en banc in the above appeal, it is O R D E R E D that the Clerk of this Court vacate the panel's opinion and judgment dated July 31, 1996 and list the above case for rehearing en banc at the convenience of the court. By the Court, /s/ Dolores K. Sloviter Dated: August 30, 1996 Chief Judge