Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

KOLKEBECK v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., 2:14-cv-00514-CW-DBP. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Utah Number: infdco20150817926 Visitors: 29
Filed: Aug. 14, 2015
Latest Update: Aug. 14, 2015
Summary: MEMORANDUM DECISION DUSTIN B. PEAD , Magistrate Judge . This matter comes before the Court on Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Rule 56(d) Motion for Additional Discovery. (Dkt. 31.) The Court being fully advised of the premises, HEREBY GRANTS Defendant's Motion. Defendant has up to and including August 21, 2015, to file it response to Plaintiff's Rule 56(d) Motion for Additional Discovery. Additionally, the parties are reminded that proposed or
More

MEMORANDUM DECISION

This matter comes before the Court on Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Rule 56(d) Motion for Additional Discovery. (Dkt. 31.) The Court being fully advised of the premises,

HEREBY GRANTS Defendant's Motion. Defendant has up to and including August 21, 2015, to file it response to Plaintiff's Rule 56(d) Motion for Additional Discovery.

Additionally, the parties are reminded that proposed orders for motions to extend time and other stipulated motions must be "emailed in an editable format to the chambers of the assigned judge." D.U. Civ. R. 7-1(a).

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer