Martin v. United States, 18-C-1570. (2020)
Court: District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Number: infdco20200225e72
Visitors: 5
Filed: Feb. 24, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 24, 2020
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM C. GRIESBACH , District Judge . The court entered an order on January 15, 2020, after counsel advised that a settlement had been reached in this action, directing counsel to file a motion to dismiss this case or a stipulation of dismissal within thirty days, unless counsel requested additional time in writing. Dkt. No. 36. To date, counsel has neither filed a motion for an extension of time nor filed a stipulation of dismissal. Counsel was warned that failure to make a timely
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM C. GRIESBACH , District Judge . The court entered an order on January 15, 2020, after counsel advised that a settlement had been reached in this action, directing counsel to file a motion to dismiss this case or a stipulation of dismissal within thirty days, unless counsel requested additional time in writing. Dkt. No. 36. To date, counsel has neither filed a motion for an extension of time nor filed a stipulation of dismissal. Counsel was warned that failure to make a timely s..
More
ORDER
WILLIAM C. GRIESBACH, District Judge.
The court entered an order on January 15, 2020, after counsel advised that a settlement had been reached in this action, directing counsel to file a motion to dismiss this case or a stipulation of dismissal within thirty days, unless counsel requested additional time in writing. Dkt. No. 36. To date, counsel has neither filed a motion for an extension of time nor filed a stipulation of dismissal. Counsel was warned that failure to make a timely submission would result in the dismissal of the action with prejudice for failure to prosecute. Accordingly, this case is dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute. Civil L.R. 41(c).
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
