Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Martin, 96-7373 (1997)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 96-7373 Visitors: 4
Filed: Jul. 28, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Opinions of the United 1997 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 7-28-1997 United States v. Martin Precedential or Non-Precedential: Docket 96-7373 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1997 Recommended Citation "United States v. Martin" (1997). 1997 Decisions. Paper 172. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1997/172 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States
More
Opinions of the United 1997 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 7-28-1997 United States v. Martin Precedential or Non-Precedential: Docket 96-7373 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1997 Recommended Citation "United States v. Martin" (1997). 1997 Decisions. Paper 172. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1997/172 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1997 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu. iled July 28, 1997 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT NO. 96-7373 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JOHN MARTIN JOHN W. MARTIN, JR., Appellant On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania (D.C. No. 93-cr-00176) Before: SLOVITER, Chief Judge, SCIRICA and SEITZ, Circuit Judges ORDER AMENDING OPINION IT IS ORDERED that the Concurrence in the Judgment Only to the slip opinion in the above case, filed on June 18, 1997, be amended as follows: Page 6, line 6 from the bottom - the word "which" should be changed to "that". By the Court, Per Curiam Dated: July 28, 1997 A True Copy: Teste: Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer