Filed: Jul. 01, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 01, 2019
Summary: MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING PACIFCORP'S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER ROBERT J. SHELBY , Chief District Judge . This is a trademark infringement case. Before the court is Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. 1 Defendants received notice of the Motion. 2 Defendants subsequently received notice of the June 13, 2019 status and scheduling conference concerning the Motion. 3 Defendants failed to appear at the conference. As of the date of this Order, Defenda
Summary: MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING PACIFCORP'S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER ROBERT J. SHELBY , Chief District Judge . This is a trademark infringement case. Before the court is Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. 1 Defendants received notice of the Motion. 2 Defendants subsequently received notice of the June 13, 2019 status and scheduling conference concerning the Motion. 3 Defendants failed to appear at the conference. As of the date of this Order, Defendan..
More
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING PACIFCORP'S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
ROBERT J. SHELBY, Chief District Judge.
This is a trademark infringement case. Before the court is Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order.1 Defendants received notice of the Motion.2 Defendants subsequently received notice of the June 13, 2019 status and scheduling conference concerning the Motion.3 Defendants failed to appear at the conference. As of the date of this Order, Defendants have not participated in this case. For Defendants' failure to respond to the Motion, for Defendants' failure to appear at the status and scheduling conference, and for good cause showing, the court GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion. See DUCivR 7-1 (d).
It is therefore ORDERED:
1. Defendant is enjoined from advertising, offering for sale or selling any product or service using the ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER Mark or any other confusingly similar mark without express, written permission from RMP;
2. Defendant is enjoined from implying that RMP has "approved," "licensed," or "endorsed" Defendant, its products, or its services in any way;
3. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(c), RMP is required to post a $10,000.00 security bond. RMP has filed notice with the Court that the bond has been posted;4
4. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(b)(2), this Order expires 14 days from the date of this Order. However, absent an appearance from Defendant in this matter by July 15, 2019, the court finds good cause to automatically renew and extend the Order for an additional 14 days.
SO ORDERED.