Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Martin v. Dana Corp, 96-1746 (1997)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 96-1746 Visitors: 5
Filed: Jun. 12, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Opinions of the United 1997 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 6-12-1997 Martin v. Dana Corp Precedential or Non-Precedential: Docket 96-1746 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1997 Recommended Citation "Martin v. Dana Corp" (1997). 1997 Decisions. Paper 129. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1997/129 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of
More
Opinions of the United 1997 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 6-12-1997 Martin v. Dana Corp Precedential or Non-Precedential: Docket 96-1746 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1997 Recommended Citation "Martin v. Dana Corp" (1997). 1997 Decisions. Paper 129. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1997/129 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1997 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu. Filed September 12, 1997 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT NO. 96-1746 KEEFE M. MARTIN, Appellant v. DANA CORPORATION On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (D.C. No. 95-cv-08024) Present: SLOVITER, Chief Judge, BECKER, STAPLETON, MANSMANN, GREENBERG, SCIRICA, COWEN, NYGAARD, ALITO, ROTH, LEWIS, and McKEE, Circuit Judges. O R D E R A majority of the active judges having voted, it is O R D E R E D that the Clerk of this Court vacate the order filed July 1, 1997 granting rehearing en banc and refer the case to the original panel for panel rehearing, the original panel having so voted. By the Court, /s/ Dolores K. Sloviter Chief Judge Dated: 9/12/97
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer