Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

COLL BUILDERS SUPPLY, INC. v. VELEZ, 6:17-cv-933-Orl-40DCI. (2017)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20170919843 Visitors: 7
Filed: Sep. 18, 2017
Latest Update: Sep. 18, 2017
Summary: ORDER PAUL G. BYRON , District Judge . This cause is before the Court on Defendant's Apex Tool & Fastener, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint (Doc. 36) filed July 10, 2017 and Defendants', Robert Valez and Rosaly Mendez Rodriguez, Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Doc. 42) filed July 24, 2017. The United States Magistrate Judge has submitted a report recommending that the motion be granted in part and denied in part. After an independent de novo review of the reco
More

ORDER

This cause is before the Court on Defendant's Apex Tool & Fastener, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint (Doc. 36) filed July 10, 2017 and Defendants', Robert Valez and Rosaly Mendez Rodriguez, Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Doc. 42) filed July 24, 2017. The United States Magistrate Judge has submitted a report recommending that the motion be granted in part and denied in part.

After an independent de novo review of the record in this matter, and noting that no objections were timely filed, the Court agrees entirely with the findings of fact and conclusions of law in the Report and Recommendation.

Therefore, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. The Report and Recommendation filed August 31, 2017 (Doc. 48), is ADOPTED and CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order.

2. Defendant Apex Tool & Fastener, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint (Doc. 36) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Apex's motion to dismiss is GRANTED in part, in that the § 1030(b) conspiracy violation contained within Count III of the Amended Complaint is DISMISSED as it relates to Apex, and the motion to dismiss is DENIED in all other respects.

3. Defendants', Robert Valez and Rosaly Mendez Rodriguez, Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Doc. 42) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The Individual Defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED in part in that the § 1030(b) conspiracy violation contained within Count III of the Amended Complaint is DISMISSED as it relates to Rodriguez and Valez, and the motion to dismiss is DENIED in all other respects.

4. Plaintiff may filed a second amended complaint, if it so chooses, on or before October 2, 2017.

DONE AND ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer