Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Askari, 95-1662 (1997)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 95-1662 Visitors: 19
Filed: Mar. 05, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Opinions of the United 1997 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 3-5-1997 United States v. Askari Precedential or Non-Precedential: Docket 95-1662 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1997 Recommended Citation "United States v. Askari" (1997). 1997 Decisions. Paper 56. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1997/56 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Cou
More
Opinions of the United 1997 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 3-5-1997 United States v. Askari Precedential or Non-Precedential: Docket 95-1662 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1997 Recommended Citation "United States v. Askari" (1997). 1997 Decisions. Paper 56. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1997/56 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1997 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _______________ NO. 95-1662 _______________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MUHAMMAD ASKARI, Appellant _______________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Crim. No. 92-cr-00288) _______________ Present: SLOVITER, Chief Judge, BECKER, STAPLETON, MANSMANN, GREENBERG, SCIRICA, COWEN, NYGAARD, ALITO, ROTH, LEWIS, McKEE, and GARTH*,Circuit Judges. O R D E R A majority of the active judges having voted for rehearing en banc in the above appeal, it is O R D E R E D that the Clerk of this Court vacate the opinion filed March 5, 1997 and list the above case for rehearing en banc at the convenience of the court. By the Court, /s/ Dolores K. Sloviter Dated:March 27, l997 Chief Judge *. as to panel rehearing only. 1
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer