Bloomquist v. Victim Advocate of Utah, 2:15-cv-849-DB-BCW. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Utah
Number: infdco20160309j50
Visitors: 14
Filed: Mar. 03, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2016
Summary: ORDER DEE BENSON , District Judge . Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Brook C. Wells on Febmary 1, 2016, recommending that this Court dismiss Plaintiffs case because: (1) the Complaint fails to state a claim; (2) Defendants are not "persons" under 1983; and (3) the Complaint is deficit in a number of aspects and allowing amendment would be futile. The parties were notified of their right to file objections to the Report and Recomm
Summary: ORDER DEE BENSON , District Judge . Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Brook C. Wells on Febmary 1, 2016, recommending that this Court dismiss Plaintiffs case because: (1) the Complaint fails to state a claim; (2) Defendants are not "persons" under 1983; and (3) the Complaint is deficit in a number of aspects and allowing amendment would be futile. The parties were notified of their right to file objections to the Report and Recomme..
More
ORDER
DEE BENSON, District Judge.
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation issued by United States
Magistrate Judge Brook C. Wells on Febmary 1, 2016, recommending that this Court dismiss Plaintiffs case because: (1) the Complaint fails to state a claim; (2) Defendants are not "persons" under § 1983; and (3) the Complaint is deficit in a number of aspects and allowing amendment would be futile.
The parties were notified of their right to file objections to the Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days after receiving it. On Febmary 8, 2016, the Plaintiff filed his Objection. [Dkt.28].
Having reviewed all relevant materials, including Plaintiffs pro se response, Defendants' reply, the record that was before the magistrate judge, and the reasoning set forth in the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation, the Court agrees with the analysis and conclusion of the magistrate judge. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Wells and orders that Plaintiffs case is DISMISSED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
