Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. RODRIGUEZ, 6:13cr82(08). (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. Texas Number: infdco20141029938 Visitors: 5
Filed: Oct. 21, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 21, 2014
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER, District Judge. By order, the undersigned referred this matter to the Honorable John D. Love, United States Magistrate Judge, at Tyler, Texas, for administration of a guilty plea under Rules 11 and 32 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Judge Love conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and the Honorable John D. Love issued his
More

ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER, District Judge.

By order, the undersigned referred this matter to the Honorable John D. Love, United States Magistrate Judge, at Tyler, Texas, for administration of a guilty plea under Rules 11 and 32 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Judge Love conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and the Honorable John D. Love issued his Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge [Clerk's doc. #534]. The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court accept Defendant's guilty plea and conditionally approve his plea agreement. He further recommended that the undersigned finally adjudge Defendant as guilty on Count Twenty-Six of the Fourth Superseding Indictment against Defendant in this cause.

The parties have not objected to the magistrate judge's findings. The Court is of the opinion that the Report and Recommendation should be accepted. It is accordingly ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [Clerk's doc. #534] of the United States Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED.

It is further ORDERED that the Defendant's guilty plea is accepted and approved by the Court. Further, the plea agreement is approved by the Court, conditioned upon a review of the presentence report. It is finally ORDERED that, pursuant to the Defendant's plea agreement, the Court finds the Defendant GUILTY of Count Twenty-Six of the Fourth Superseding Indictment in the above-numbered cause and enters a JUDGMENT OF GUILTY against the Defendant as to Count Twenty-Six of the Fourth Superseding Indictment.

It is SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer