Mancillas v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID, 2:17-CV-0180. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. Texas
Number: infdco20171122a81
Visitors: 3
Filed: Nov. 09, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 09, 2017
Summary: ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS, ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION and DENYING PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS MARY LOU ROBINSON , Senior District Judge . Petitioner has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus challenging a state prison disciplinary decision. On October 26, 2017, the United States Magistrate Judge issued findings, conclusions and a recommendation in this cause, recommending therein that the habeas application be denied because petitioner is not el
Summary: ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS, ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION and DENYING PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS MARY LOU ROBINSON , Senior District Judge . Petitioner has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus challenging a state prison disciplinary decision. On October 26, 2017, the United States Magistrate Judge issued findings, conclusions and a recommendation in this cause, recommending therein that the habeas application be denied because petitioner is not eli..
More
ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS, ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION and DENYING PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
MARY LOU ROBINSON, Senior District Judge.
Petitioner has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus challenging a state prison disciplinary decision. On October 26, 2017, the United States Magistrate Judge issued findings, conclusions and a recommendation in this cause, recommending therein that the habeas application be denied because petitioner is not eligible for mandatory supervised release. On November 7, 2017, petitioner filed objections to the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation.
The undersigned United States Senior District Judge has made an independent examination of the record in this case. Petitioner's objections are OVERRULED, and the Magistrate Judge's Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation is hereby ADOPTED. Accordingly, the application for a writ of habeas corpus filed by petitioner is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
