Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

BANNISTER v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, 5:14cv30. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. Texas Number: infdco20141029932 Visitors: 7
Filed: Oct. 21, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 21, 2014
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER, District Judge. The above-entitled and numbered civil action was heretofore referred to United States Magistrate Judge Caroline M. Craven pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636. The Report of the Magistrate Judge which contains her proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such action has been presented for consideration. No objections to the Report and Recommendation were file
More

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER, District Judge.

The above-entitled and numbered civil action was heretofore referred to United States Magistrate Judge Caroline M. Craven pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The Report of the Magistrate Judge which contains her proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such action has been presented for consideration. No objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed. The Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct. Therefore, the Court hereby adopts the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of this Court. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that Defendant's Opposed Motion to Reverse With Remand and Enter Judgment (Dkt. No. 9) is hereby GRANTED. It is further

ORDERED that Plaintiff's above-entitled and numbered civil action is REVERSED and REMANDED under the fourth sentence of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), to the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration for further administrative proceedings before an Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ"). It is further

ORDERED that on remand an ALJ shall fully consider all medical opinions and the limitations contained therein and reevaluate those opinions when formulating the residual functional capacity. It is further

ORDERED that all motions not previously ruled on are DENIED, and the referral order is VACATED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer