Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Continental Casualty Co v. D'Andrea, 97-5004 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 97-5004 Visitors: 7
Filed: Sep. 08, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Opinions of the United 1998 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 9-8-1998 Continental Casualty Co v. D'Andrea Precedential or Non-Precedential: Docket 97-5004 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1998 Recommended Citation "Continental Casualty Co v. D'Andrea" (1998). 1998 Decisions. Paper 216. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1998/216 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinion
More
Opinions of the United 1998 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 9-8-1998 Continental Casualty Co v. D'Andrea Precedential or Non-Precedential: Docket 97-5004 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1998 Recommended Citation "Continental Casualty Co v. D'Andrea" (1998). 1998 Decisions. Paper 216. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1998/216 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1998 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu. Filed September 8, 1998 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 97-5004 CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY v. DOMINICK D'ANDREA, INC., Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff v. ALMONESSON ASSOCIATES; TARQUINI ORGANIZATION; THE DOUGLAS COMPANY; JOHN DOE 1-10, being a fictitious person, corporation or entity, Third-Party Defendants Dominick D'Andrea, Inc., Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court For the District of New Jersey (D.C. No.: 93-cv-1765) Argued: January 22, 1998 Before: SLOVITER, LEWIS, and ROSENN, Circuit Judges. ORDER AMENDING OPINION IT IS ORDERED that the slip opinion in the above case, filed on July 10, 1998, be amended as follows: Add the following footnote to the concurring opinion to be signaled at the end of the text on page 24 of the slip opinion: Following the filing of this opinion, four district court judges of the District of New Jersey who are familiar with the magistrate judge in question have informed me that the magistrate judge is "one of the most understanding, patient, and attorney-friendly judges [they] know." Nothing in this opinion is intended to reflect on the ability of the magistrate judge, nor on his behavior or performance in any case other than the one at issue. By the Court, Dolores K. Sloviter Circuit Judge Dated: September 8, 1998 A True Copy: Teste: Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer