WELLS v. SCHOFIELD, 3-14-1913. (2015)
Court: District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Number: infdco20151002f51
Visitors: 9
Filed: Sep. 29, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 29, 2015
Summary: ORDER TODD J. CAMPBELL , District Judge . Pending before the Court are a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 42) and Objections filed by the Plaintiff (Docket Nos. 50 and 51). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) and Local Rule 72.03(b)(3), the Court has reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation, the Objections, and the file. The Objections of the Plaintiff are overruled, and the Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved. Acc
Summary: ORDER TODD J. CAMPBELL , District Judge . Pending before the Court are a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 42) and Objections filed by the Plaintiff (Docket Nos. 50 and 51). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) and Local Rule 72.03(b)(3), the Court has reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation, the Objections, and the file. The Objections of the Plaintiff are overruled, and the Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved. Acco..
More
ORDER
TODD J. CAMPBELL, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 42) and Objections filed by the Plaintiff (Docket Nos. 50 and 51).
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) and Local Rule 72.03(b)(3), the Court has reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation, the Objections, and the file. The Objections of the Plaintiff are overruled, and the Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved.
Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (Docket No. 4) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
