VARELA v. U.S., H-07-0343. (2012)
Court: District Court, S.D. Texas
Number: infdco20120529a52
Visitors: 14
Filed: May 29, 2012
Latest Update: May 29, 2012
Summary: FINAL JUDGMENT LEE H. ROSENTHAL, District Judge. In accordance with the court's memorandum opinions issued today and on June 1, 2011, this refund action is dismissed, with prejudice. The plaintiffs take nothing on their refund claims. Each party is to bears their own costs and fees. This is a final judgment. If an appeal is taken from this final judgment, the plaintiffs must inform the Fifth Circuit in their notice of appeal of the pending appeal before that court in a substantially similar c
Summary: FINAL JUDGMENT LEE H. ROSENTHAL, District Judge. In accordance with the court's memorandum opinions issued today and on June 1, 2011, this refund action is dismissed, with prejudice. The plaintiffs take nothing on their refund claims. Each party is to bears their own costs and fees. This is a final judgment. If an appeal is taken from this final judgment, the plaintiffs must inform the Fifth Circuit in their notice of appeal of the pending appeal before that court in a substantially similar ca..
More
FINAL JUDGMENT
LEE H. ROSENTHAL, District Judge.
In accordance with the court's memorandum opinions issued today and on June 1, 2011, this refund action is dismissed, with prejudice. The plaintiffs take nothing on their refund claims. Each party is to bears their own costs and fees. This is a final judgment.
If an appeal is taken from this final judgment, the plaintiffs must inform the Fifth Circuit in their notice of appeal of the pending appeal before that court in a substantially similar case, Kercher v. United States, No. 12-40483 (appeal docketed May 1, 2012).
Source: Leagle