LALL v. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, 3:13-CV-3840-L. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. Texas
Number: infdco20160726b80
Visitors: 8
Filed: Jul. 25, 2016
Latest Update: Jul. 25, 2016
Summary: ORDER SAM A. LINDSAY , District Judge . Before the court is a letter from Plaintiff Annette Lall ("Plaintiff"), which the court construes as a Motion to File a Notice of Appeal (Doc. 101), filed January 15, 2016. This motion was referred to Magistrate Judge Paul D. Stickney who entered Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge ("Report") on July 5, 2016, recommending that the court deny Plaintiff's motion because it was not timely filed. No objections
Summary: ORDER SAM A. LINDSAY , District Judge . Before the court is a letter from Plaintiff Annette Lall ("Plaintiff"), which the court construes as a Motion to File a Notice of Appeal (Doc. 101), filed January 15, 2016. This motion was referred to Magistrate Judge Paul D. Stickney who entered Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge ("Report") on July 5, 2016, recommending that the court deny Plaintiff's motion because it was not timely filed. No objections t..
More
ORDER
SAM A. LINDSAY, District Judge.
Before the court is a letter from Plaintiff Annette Lall ("Plaintiff"), which the court construes as a Motion to File a Notice of Appeal (Doc. 101), filed January 15, 2016. This motion was referred to Magistrate Judge Paul D. Stickney who entered Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge ("Report") on July 5, 2016, recommending that the court deny Plaintiff's motion because it was not timely filed. No objections to the Report were filed.
Having reviewed the file, record in this case, and Report, the court determines that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct, and accepts them as those of the court. Accordingly, the court denies Plaintiff's Motion to File a Notice of Appeal.
It is so ordered.
Source: Leagle
